I invented a road-trip card game for two or more players. The rules of the game are simple and can be quickly learned by young children. It is designed for play where there is no table for laying out cards such as playing from passenger seats in a vehicle so there is no draw pile and it does not require shuffling.
Each player starts with their own pack of cards as their hand. If there is only a single pack of cards to be shared by all of the players, divide the pack between the players by suit colors or suits. The time to play a game is proportional to the number of cards in a hand so some ranks or suits may be removed from play for a shorter game.
A player may view the card faces in their hand but should keep them hidden from the other players. At the beginning of a round, each player selects a card from their hand and holds it out with the back of the card facing the other players. After each player is holding out a card, all players simultaneously flip the cards around to reveal the ranks of the cards.
The player with the card with the highest rank adds all of the cards played that round face down onto their points pile. If there is a tie for the highest rank,
each player adds the card that they played that round to their own
points pile, regardless of whether or not they were one of the two or more players that played the cards that tied for the highest rank. Players may not review the faces of the cards in a points pile from their own points pile or that of another player. A shirt pocket may be used to hold a points pile where there is no table space so long as the card faces are not showing.
The rounds continue until there are no more cards remaining in the player hands. The winner of the game is the player with the most cards in their points pile. Each pack should have a different card design so that the cards can be
easily sorted back into their original packs after the game ends.
In some ways, this card game feels like playing the hand game Rock Paper Scissors except that a card can only be played once during a game. Because of this, a player wants to avoid winning a round by playing a very high ranking card against very low ranking cards. I named this card game "One-up" based on a winning strategy in which a player guesses the highest rank of the cards that will be played by the other players that round and then selects a card which is just one greater.
I decided to create a website collecting the advice that I want to pass on to my descendants. I was able to get the website up and running tonight with some initial placeholder content. I am calling it Papa's Anthology of Paternal Advice (PAPA).
I was inspired to create this website by similar books which were written by authors for the benefit of their children. I have also heard that one should leave letters to your children to be read after you have passed. As I document my thoughts on a variety of topics, I plan to keep in
mind my children and grandchildren who are
reading it as adults, possibly with children of their own.
I plan to harvest some of my essays from this blog to add to the site. Eventually I might like to republish the PAPA website as a print book. That way my descendants can have a tangible expression of my hopes for their success.
For the last couple of months, I have been at home due to the COVID-19 pandemic travel restrictions. Now that the "shelter at home" orders have been lifted, I finally got out of the house a couple of days ago to visit relatives at the family farm. Since I have been wearing nothing but athletic shorts and t-shirts recently, it was a pleasant surprise when I put on my jeans and discovered that they were loose.
Over the last two-and-a-half months, I have lost twenty-two pounds. I now weigh less than I have in more than seven very busy years. I will explain how this serendipity became the silver lining in my coronavirus cloud.
It started in mid-March when I suddenly found that I had some unexpected free time on my hands due in part to the beginning of the pandemic. To reduce stress, I converted that into treadmill time. I was then able to achieve my daily goal of ten thousand (10k) steps per day on a consistent basis.
Shortly thereafter, my employer announced a step challenge for April with a gift card as a reward for each employee who reached a specified threshold. Half-way through the month, my employer also announced that a matching amount would also go to a charity chosen by the participating employee. That month I averaged 25k steps per day with a peak of 40k.
I have had a treadmill desk called a TrekDesk for five years but before April I had never really tried to use it while working from home. Mostly I would just use it to walk while watching movies or playing multiplayer video games with my sons. Because of the informal competition of seeing the recorded progress of other employees on a shared online spreadsheet, I decided to step up my game.
I was able to figure out a treadmill speed that was just fast enough that the pedometer on my mobile phone would consistently record a step while also still slow enough that I could continue to use the mouse and keyboard effectively. I think this was only possible because I am a touch typist. Once I was able to get into the zone while writing code, the time would slip away without me even noticing that I was also exercising.
I do the treading in two to four sessions per day. I will tread for a bit, eat a meal, do some sit-down work for an hour or so while I digest, and then get back on the treadmill and repeat. On some days when I am really motivated I will do my first treadmill session before I eat breakfast.
I think I have been losing weight by doing this for two reasons. The first is that when I reach a certain excessive number of steps per day, I am going to lose weight no matter how much I eat. Previously I have been able to lose weight by carefully counting my daily calories but this way just seems so much easier.
The second reason is that I am doing less snacking between meals. I do not want to put food in my stomach if I know I am going back on the treadmill for another session soon. I also do not want to snack at night when I am eagerly looking forward to weighing myself in the morning to see my progress.
I think getting good sleep is also an important factor in losing weight. My extra free time lets me get to bed earlier which then makes it more likely that I will exercise more the next day. To complete the virtuous circle, exercising more during the day helps me to fall asleep earlier at night.
There are a couple of reasons while I have persisted in continuing to walk daily since the step challenge ended almost a month ago. The first is that now it has become a habit and I actually start to feel somewhat uncomfortable when I have not used the treadmill for awhile. This corresponds with what I have heard about regular exercise becoming physically addictive.
This feels like some kind of cool mind hack
like choosing video games that are both addictive and educational. I am looking
forward to the day when the virtual reality technology that lets you run while playing
first-person multiplayer shooters becomes affordable for home use. I think at that
point the world-wide obesity epidemic will come to a screeching halt for the
young male demographic.
Speaking of which, the other reason I am still striving to increase my average daily step count is that I know that "diabesity" is a major co-morbidity factor for COVID-19. A couple of decades ago I was in bed for a month with pneumonia in which I constantly felt like I could not breathe. I might say that for me personally there is a tinge of panic to this shared pandemic experience that has me "running" scared.
Previously I wrote about my Fits on the Boat approach to minimalism. This month I finished reading the book The Minimalist Home by Joshua Becker. I was able to find a large-print edition at my local library.
One of the best ideas in the book that was new to me was the concept of the "convenience fallacy". Instead of leaving items out for easy access later, I now put my work papers and flip-flops away when I am not using them. The benefits of having a clean desk and floor space and the effect on the room as a whole outweigh the minimal extra effort.
Another idea was to get rid of specialized tools that do not work as well as simpler tools. After reading this, I happily threw away my three-in-one avocado slicer without a trace of guilt. I find that using a knife and a spoon is at least as effective.
The author describes his "Becker method" for de-cluttering a house. My simpler approach is to find something to get rid of each day. I have added the task "Minimize" to my advancing tasks grid for daily maintenance.
When I am struggling to find something that I am willing to get rid of on a particular day, I will often resort to simply throwing away an unread magazine. I am of the opinion that a magazine that I have already read does not count for this purpose as this is also about unburdening myself from unnecessary obligations. Minimalism is about clearing the way, in both space and time, for new chapters in your life.
I just finished reading the book Seven at Sea by Erik and Emily Orton in which parents describe their adventures sailing with their five children. Stressed out by the struggle to get by in the big city, the family takes off for a year in the cruising catamaran Fezywig. They later return to the comforts of home but then continue to seek escape as summarized in the epilogue.
It was an interesting contrast with another cruising family that I have been watching on YouTube, the crew of Zatara. Recently I had a chance to attend a meet-and-greet event with the Sailing Zatara family in Flower Mound, Texas. You can see me briefly in the background of their latest video.
The main difference between the two crews is how much money they had to spend for their journeys. For Fezywig, the trip was a temporary respite which left them financially drained. For Zatara, going back to land is just a vacation from their vacation because they are enjoying a well-funded early retirement.
The main similarity is how the fathers were stressed out by their careers and craved more time with their families while their children were still young. These fathers sought the refuge of blue space. I also see this in the first few minutes of the first episode of Travels by Narrowboat in which a man describes the burnout that is his life and then enthuses about gliding away from it all.
One of my favorite YouTube channels is Sailing Zatara in which a couple documents their adventures sailing around the world on a cruising catamaran with their four youngest children. Their oldest child is not on the boat with them since she recently gave birth. The family is able to enjoy this alternative lifestyle because they are living off of retirement savings.
In a previous blog entry Floating Families, I noted that alternative lifestyles are often not sustainable through multiple generations. When the crew of Sailing Zatara came to the Dallas area where I live for a meet-and-greet recently, I asked during the question and answer session how likely it was that their children would be raising their grandchildren on a boat. The parents identified by name which of their children probably would or would not and mentioned that their oldest daughter and grandchild might join them on the boat in the next season of the show.
This response also answered my unspoken question as to how the next generation could afford to raise a family while continuously traveling. In this case, it appears that in the initial phase the second and third generations will live off of the accumulated wealth that was earned by the first generation from working on land. I can see where the children might be able to sustain this lifestyle at sea by growing income from a spin-off YouTube channel and its associated branded merchandise.
In the 1952 novel The Rolling Stones by my favorite science fiction writer Robert Heinlein, the fictional "Space Family Stone" sustains their space-cruising lifestyle by writing scripts for a television series in addition to dabbling in trade. I think the key here is that this sort of migratory lifestyle can work for those who are able to telecommute, especially those who are able to create intellectual property wherever they might happen to be from day to day. While earning a living as a seafaring family strictly from YouTube celebrity will not be possible for most due to eventual market saturation, I can imagine getting by doing something more mundane such as writing software for mobile and web applications.
The Stoics reasoned that all of our joys and sorrows are ephemeral. Documenting what you have good right now might someday come to seem at best bittersweet and at worst a painful reminder of loss. Health, wealth, and wisdom all eventually fade.
The Stoics did not seem to recognize that there are indeed some things to get excited about. Blessings that extend into perpetuity, such as children and grandchildren, still matter even after you are no longer capable of caring. I think a gratitude journal should focus on those things that survive you after death.
I am grateful for the following:
My children and all of my future descendants
That my children will raise their children in freedom
That happiness for all people is gradually improving over time
That future medical technology will eventually conquer death
Optimism is prerequisite. We pursue our goals tenaciously despite repeated setbacks. We recognize long-term incremental progress. We hope for the best and prepare for the best.
While reading online articles in preparation for writing my recent blog post about maximizing your pre-tax deductions, I came across a statement which I initially discounted because I did not understand it. The author mentioned the annual maximum contributions one could make to retirement accounts if one had both a 401(k) and an Individual Retirement Account (IRA). I had previously incorrectly supposed that one could not have an IRA account on top of an employer-sponsored 401(k) or 403(b) plan.
I see now that in addition to contributing to a 401(k) and a Health Savings Account (HSA), one could also save another six thousand dollars in an IRA. For those over fifty-years-old, there is an extra one thousand dollars for a total annual contribution limit of seven thousand dollars. Furthermore, an additional six or seven thousand dollars can be put aside in a separate IRA for a spouse even if the spouse does not earn income.
I think my initial confusion came about because of limitations on the pre-tax deductibility of the IRA when your employer offers a 401(k) plan. If you make more than about twice median household income and you have a pre-tax 401(k), you cannot also deduct from your income tax your contributions to a traditional IRA. I am not sure if there is any benefit to contributing to a traditional IRA if you cannot make pre-tax contributions.
An alternative to consider, however, is the Roth IRA in which you make post-tax contributions instead of pre-tax. Unlike a traditional IRA, the benefit of a Roth IRA is that you do not have to pay taxes on your interest income in retirement. This good deal from Congress to encourage Americans to save phases out for those making more than about three times median household income.
So in addition to contributing to your HSA and your employer-sponsored 401(k) or 403(b) plan, consider also investing in an IRA, whether Roth or traditional. As your income increases over time, you might first put in just enough to your 401(k) to get the employer matching, then maximize your HSA contribution, followed by maximizing a Roth IRA contribution, and then returning to put any remainder of your available income in your 401(k) up to its annual limit. You have some time to decide your financial priorities as the deadline for opening an IRA with funds that count toward the annual limit for the current tax year is not until April 15th of the following year.
I was thinking the other day about what the difference is between people who stop working on a job when they have met minimum requirements versus those who keep working on it until there is no more work to be done. An example would be a student who hurries through an exam and turns it in early contrasted with another who spends extra time to double-check all of their work. It is the difference between a "C" student and an "A" student.
I was also thinking about something related with regard to being inconsiderate versus considerate. An inconsiderate person will increase the workload of others for the purpose of minimizing their own. When an inconsiderate person fails to finish a job properly, they often are not even thinking about the impact to others who have to do the final cleanup.
It might be that the word that I am looking for to describe both of these aspects is conscientiousness. When I read and watch videos about it online, I see that many describe it as one of the key personality traits. Some further subdivide conscientiousness into orderliness and industriousness.
Being conscientious has long-term benefits. This implies that those who are not conscientious should try to become more so. Unfortunately this kind of change requires conscientious effort.
Posts
