The latest Brights Bulletin cites Dunk, et al. (2017) A multifactorial analysis of acceptance of evolution. Quoting from the study: "Understanding of the nature of science was the single most important factor associated with the study of evolution [...]". This suggests to me that we need to focus less on teaching acquired knowledge and more on the knowledge acquisition process.
I provided an explanation of the Scientific Method in a sermon some years ago. This seems insufficient by itself, however, as the whole process is wrapped in something larger which requires the application of logic. From what I read in Wikipedia, the word Reason is probably what I am looking for here.
Before I pulled it out, a previous version of my Optihumanist Principles included "Reason and the Scientific Method are paths to the truth." I am re-inserting that back into my 2017 version in this form:
We uphold reason and science as paths to the truth.
I am reading some books that we bought for our children on this topic:
-
Ruchlis (1991) How Do You Know It's True? Discovering the Difference Between Science and Superstition
-
Barker (1993) Maybe Yes, Maybe No: A Guide for Young Skeptics
-
Dawkins (2011) The Magic of Reality: How We Know What's Really True